In a recent post, I recommended the book in A Swim in a Pond in the Rain by George Saunders. One of the short stories featured called “The Singers” by Turgenev helped me find a bit of clarity on some notions about furniture that I’ve had for some time.
*Spoiler Alert* “The Singers” tells of a contest in a country pub where a showy and practiced singer loses to a more crude but expressive one, whose intimate performance brings the stunned crowd to tears. I think about this story a lot and it’s portrayal of the power of expression, even amongst a group of rough and rowdy Russian peasants in a drab village in the mid 1800’s.
The story brought to mind this piece by Garry Knox Bennett. You might already be familiar with it… and the tempers it ignites.
It’s a well made piece of furniture with a nail pounded in the front, carelessly enough to be bent over. It begs the question “What the hell, Garry?!” But I think anyone who has ever build a time consuming, finicky piece from precious materials will relate to this urge. He let loose a coarse instinct and crude skill to express his frustration with the nature and value of the cabinet. Did he ruin it? Is it a childish gesture? Maybe, but if I saw this piece with no nail in it, my only interest would be a vague wonder at the construction and whether it would hold my collection of ashtrays. But with the nail, I love this piece and it’s lived in my head for years because it assaults the notion that woodworking has a single destination towards furniture valued for it’s technical achievement and exclusivity.
Bennett is playing the roles of both singers in the short story. He demonstrates his chops as a craftsman and then challenges expectations by stepping from behind the scenes with an unrestrained expression. It’s shouting that there’s more potential to the craft than polished wood and good joinery.
I make things in wood, but if I’m being honest, I’ve fallen out of love with wood objects. It’s become hard for me to care, and I think it’s one of the best things to happen to me. Because even as a more reticent viewer and maker, I’m often delighted and challenged by objects that demonstrate how alive woodwork can be.
In future posts, I’m going to focus on some work I admire and why I think it adds up to more than just materials and techniques. The choices and instincts of the maker are intimate expressions and while I could follow their processes and emulate their final product, I know it’s merely a thin impression. Picasso, who copied other artists throughout his career, said something akin to, “Try to create like another, you will fail, and that is where you will glimpse yourself”.
I may be a curmudgeon, but when I see work I wish I could create, I still swoon like a Russian peasant.
From a life-time presenting live performing arts I have learned not to pidgin-hole one art form or discipline from another. There is value in both the classical and vernacular forms, high vs. low, folk arts passed on from one generation to the next, so called craft v. so called art. When we are drawn into the maker’s choices and into their experience for these decisions…that is where the magic happens
Very interesting and very good article in FWW this month Peter.